期刊名称：PLOS BIOLOGY
 期刊简介(About the journal)
投稿须知(Instructions to Authors)
编辑部信息(Editorial Board)
About the journal
PLoS Biology (eISSN-1545-7885; ISSN-1544-9173) is an open-access, peer-reviewed general biology journal published monthly, online and in print, by the Public Library of Science (PLoS). PLoS is a nonprofit organization of scientists and physicians committed to making the world's scientific and medical literature a public resource.
Open-Access
All works published in the PLoS Biology are open access, licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License. Everything is immediately available without cost to anyone, anywhere ?to read, download, redistribute, include in databases, and otherwise use ?provided that the original author and source are credited. Copyright is retained by the author. Publishing costs are offset by a publication fee charged to authors. PLoS waives the fee for authors with insufficient funds. The ability to pay is not known by the editors, and never affects the decision whether to publish an article.
Impact Factor
PLoS Biology was recently ranked in the top-tier of life science journals by The Institute for Scientific Information (ISI), with a preliminary impact factor of 13.9. For more information, read our August 2005 editorial, Measures of Impact.
Scope
PLoS Biology features works of exceptional significance in all areas of biological science, from molecules to ecosystems, including works at the interface with other disciplines, such as chemistry, medicine, and mathematics.
Contents
- Outstanding primary research articles in all aspects of biology from molecules to ecosystems.
- Synopses are summaries of research articles that will be accessible to researchers in all disciplines as well as a lay readership.
- The Community Page is a forum for organizations and societies to highlight their efforts to enhance the dissemination and value of scientific knowledge.
- Unsolved Mysteries discuss a topic of biological importance that is poorly understood and in need of research attention.
- Primers provide a concise introduction into an important aspect of biology that is of broad and current interest.
- Essays are pieces that articulate an opinion on a specific topic of interest to scientists.
- Features are in-depth articles that cover topics of broad scientific interest that have relevance beyond the scientific community.
- Book reviews and more.
Do you have an idea for an Unsolved Mystery or Community Page? Please contact our editorial staff at biology_editors@plos.org.
Instructions to Authors
Contents:
About PLoS Biology
Criteria for Publication
Overview of the Editorial Process
Preparation of Research Manuscripts
Submission of Research Manuscripts
Other Types of Articles
Outline of the Production Process
TOP
1. About PLoS Biology
PLoS Biology is an open-access journal published by the Public Library of Science. The journal will publish results of exceptional significance, originality, and relevance in all disciplines of biological science. This includes science at the interface between biology and other disciplines, such as medicine, physics, chemistry, mathematics, statistics, and computer science. Our audience is the international scientific community as well as educators, policy makers, patient advocacy groups, and interested members of the public around the world.
PLoS Biology is published monthly online and in print.
TOP
2. Criteria for Publication
To be considered for publication in PLoS Biology, any given manuscript must be exceptional in the following ways:
Originality
Importance to researchers in its field
Interest to scientists outside the field
Rigorous methodology and substantial evidence for its conclusions
TOP
3. Overview of the Editorial Process
Our aim is to provide all authors with an efficient, courteous, and constructive editorial process. To achieve its required level of quality, PLoS Biology is highly selective in the manuscripts that it publishes; rejection rates are high. To ensure the fairest and most objective decision-making, the editorial process is run as a partnership between the PLoS Biology professional editors and the editorial board, which is comprised of leaders in all fields of biology.
Submitted manuscripts will be assigned to one of the PLoS Biology editors, who select as a coeditor a member of the editorial board with expertise in the relevant area of biology. The editor and editorial board member will promptly evaluate the paper and decide if it is likely to meet the requirement of providing a major advance in a particular field and describing a sufficient body of work to support that claim, and, if so, it will be sent out for peer review.
In situations in which authors are unsure whether their work satisfies the basic requirements for publication in PLoS Biology, we are happy to consider presubmission inquiries. Responses to these inquiries will normally be provided within 48 hours. Authors who receive an invitation to submit their manuscripts will then enter the regular editorial process.
Expert reviewers will be asked to assess the technical and scientific merits of the work. Once all reviews have been received and considered by the professional and academic editors, a decision letter to the author will be drafted. Occasionally, this letter, along with all the reviewer comments, may be circulated to all reviewers, who will be given a short time to comment on the editorial decision.
There are several types of decision possible: accept the paper as submitted; accept it with revision; invite the authors to revise the manuscript prior to the final decision; reject the paper, but with encouragement to resubmit it after extensive revision; or reject the manuscript outright, typically because it does not meet the criteria outlined above of originality, importance to the field, cross-discipline interest, or sound methodology. If the decision is to allow resubmission, the author will be advised in the decision letter whether the paper will require further peer review at that time. The revised manuscript will be assessed by a professional editor and editorial board member(s). Sometimes, re-review will be required, but in general we aim to make decisions without involving multiple rounds of review.
Upon acceptance, the manuscript enters our production system. Articles may be published online before a complete issue is assembled, but all will appear online and in print within a very short space of time. Publication may be further expedited when warranted.
TOP
4. Preparation of Research Manuscripts
PLoS Biology publishes original research articles of outstanding scientific significance. We will consider manuscripts of any length; we encourage the submission of both substantial full-length bodies of work and shorter manuscripts that report novel findings that might be based on a more limited range of experiments. The key criteria are that the work demonstrates clearly its novelty, its importance to a particular field as well as its interest to those outside that discipline, and conclusions that are justified by the study.
The writing style should be concise and accessible. Editors will make suggestions for how to achieve this, as well as suggestions for cuts or additions that could be made to the article to strengthen the argument. Our aim is to make the editorial process rigorous and consistent, but not intrusive or overbearing. Authors are encouraged to use their own voice and to decide how best to present their ideas, results, and conclusions.
Although we encourage submissions from around the globe, we require that manuscripts be submitted in English. As a step towards overcoming language barriers, we encourage authors fluent in other languages to provide copies of their full articles or abstracts in other languages. Translations should be submitted as supporting information and listed, together with other supporting information files, at the end of the article text.
Organization of the Manuscript
Most articles published in PLoS Biology will be organized into the following sections: Title, authors, affiliations, summary, introduction, results, discussion, materials and methods, references, acknowledgments, and figure legends. Uniformity in format will facilitate the experience of readers and users of the journal. There are no specific length restrictions for the overall manuscript or individual sections. However, we urge authors to present and discuss their findings concisely. We recognize that some works will not be best presented in our research article format. If you have a manuscript that would benefit from a different format, please contact the editors to discuss this further.
Our submission system can support a large range of formats for text and graphics, but if you experience difficulties with the site or are concerned about the suitability of your files, please contact the production department.
Title (75 characters)
The title should be specific to the project yet concise. It should be comprehensible to readers outside your field. Avoid specialist abbreviations, if possible. Titles should be presented in title case, meaning that all words except for prepositions, articles, and conjunctions should be capitalized.
Example:
Detection of Specific Sequences among DNA Fragments Separated by Gel Electrophoresis
Please also provide a brief "running head" of approximately 40 characters.
Authors and Affiliations
Provide the first names or initials (if used), middle names or initials (if used), and surnames and affiliations - department, university or organization, city, state/province (if applicable), and country - for all authors. One of the authors should be designated as the corresponding author. If the article has been submitted on behalf of a consortium, all author names and affiliations should be listed at the end of the article.
Summary
The summary succinctly introduces the paper. It should mention the techniques used without going into methodological detail and summarize the most important results. The summary is conceptually divided into the following three sections: Background, Methodology/Principal Findings, and Conclusions/Significance. Please do not include any citations in the summary. Avoid specialist abbreviations.
Introduction
The introduction should put the focus of the manuscript into a broader context. As you compose the introduction, think of readers who are not experts in this field. Include a brief review of the key literature. If there are relevant controversies or disagreements in the field, they should be mentioned so that a non-expert reader can delve into these issues further. The introduction should conclude with a brief statement of the overall aim of the experiments and a comment about whether that aim was achieved.
Results
The results section should provide details of all of the experiments that are required to support the conclusions of the paper. There is no specific word limit for this section, but details of experiments that are peripheral to the main thrust of the article and that detract from the focus of the article should not be included. The section may be divided into subsections, each with a concise subheading. Large datasets, including raw data, should be submitted as supplemental files; these are published online alongside the accepted article. The results section should be written in past tense.
Discussion
The discussion should spell out the major conclusions of the work along with some explanation or speculation on the significance of these conclusions. How do the conclusions affect the existing assumptions and models in the field? How can future research build on these observations? What are the key experiments that must be done? The discussion should be concise and tightly argued. The results and discussion may be combined into one section, if desired.
Materials and Methods
This section should provide enough detail for reproduction of the findings. Protocols for new methods should be included, but well-established protocols may simply be referenced. We encourage authors to submit, as separate files, detailed protocols for newer or less well-established methods. These will be published online only, but will be linked to the article and will be fully searchable.
References
Only published or accepted manuscripts should be included in the reference list. Meetings abstracts, conference talks, or papers that have been submitted but not yet accepted should not be cited. Limited citation of unpublished work should be included in the body of the text only. All personal communications should be supported by a letter from the relevant authors.
Download EndNote style file
Download Reference Manager style file
Download BibTeX style file (kindly provided by Tim Holy)
Windows users, hold down "Ctrl" key and click the link to download the file to your computer.
Mac users, hold down "option" key and click the link to download the file to your computer.
PLoS uses the numbered citation (citation-sequence) method. References are listed and numbered in the order that they appear in the text. In the text, citations should be indicated by the reference number in brackets. Multiple citations within a single set of brackets should be separated by commas. Where there are more than three sequential citations, they should be given as a range. Example: "...has been shown previously [1,4-6,22]." Make sure the parts of the manuscript are in the following order before ordering the citations: Introduction, Results, Discussion, Materials and Methods, captions for Supporting Information files (figures, tables, etc.), Acknowledgments, Figure captions, Tables.
Because all references will be linked electronically as much as possible to the papers they cite, proper formatting of the references is crucial. Please use the following style for the reference list:
Published papers
Sanger F, Nicklen S, Coulson AR (1977) DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 74: 5463-5467.
Please list the first five authors and then add "et al." if there are additional authors. Use of a DOI number to the full-text article is acceptable as an alternative to or in addition to traditional volume and page numbers.
Accepted papers
Same as above, but "in press" appears instead of the page numbers. Example: Anim Behav. In press.
Electronic journal articles
Loker WM (1996) "Campesinos" and the crisis of modernization in Latin America. Jour Pol Ecol 3(1). Available: http://www.library.arizona.edu/ej/jpe/volume_3/ascii-lokeriso.txt via the Internet. Accessed 1996 Aug 11.
Books
Bates B (1992) Bargaining for life: A social history of tuberculosis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. 435 p.
Book chapters
Hansen B (1991) New York City epidemics and history for the public. In: Harden VA, Risse GB, editors. AIDS and the historian. Bethesda: National Institute of Health. pp. 21-28.
Acknowledgments
Acknowledgments should include details of the funding sources that have supported the work.
Accession Numbers
All appropriate datasets, images, and information should be deposited in public resources. Please provide the relevant accession numbers (and version numbers, if appropriate). Suggested databases include, but are not limited to:
ArrayExpress
Database of Interacting Proteins
DNA Data Bank of Japan [DDBJ]
EMBL Nucleotide Sequence Database
GenBank
Gene Expression Omnibus [GEO]
Protein Data Bank
Swiss-Prot
These numbers will be linked in the published paper to the relevant database entries.
In addition, as much as possible, please provide accession numbers or identifiers for all entities such as genes, proteins, mutants, diseases, etc., for which there is an entry in a public database, for example:
FlyBase
InterPro
LocusLink
OMIM
as well as those listed above. The accession number should be provided in parentheses after the entity on first use only. This will allow linking to and from established databases and will integrate your article with a broader collection of scientific information.
Abbreviations
List all non-standard abbreviations in alphabetical order, along with their expanded form. Define them as well upon first use in the text. Non-standard abbreviations should not be used unless they appear at least three times in the text.
Nomenclature
The use of standardized nomenclature in all fields of biology is an essential step toward the integration and linking of scientific information reported in published literature. We will enforce the use of correct and established nomenclature wherever possible. Here are some brief guidelines for PLoS Biology:
Species names should be italicized (e.g., Homo sapiens, Sus scrofa, Zea mays).
Genes, mutations, genotypes, and alleles should be indicated in italics. Use the recommended name by consulting the appropriate genetic nomenclature database. It is sometimes advisable to indicate the synonyms for the gene the first time it appears in the text. Gene prefixes such as those used for oncogenes or cellular localization should be shown in roman: v-fes, c-MYC, etc.
Gene products (proteins and phenotypes) should be indicated in roman (not italicized) text. Again, use the recommended name.
When referring to a specific chromosome, the c should be capitalized (e.g., Chromosome 2). Chromosome anomalies are not italicized.
Sequences, loci, and deletions follow the standard convention for the species and are not italicized.
Plasmids are shown in roman type.
Figures
If the article is accepted for publication, the author will be asked to supply high resolution, print-ready versions of the figures.� Please ensure that the files conform to our Guidelines for Figure Preparation, when preparing your figures for production. Figures submitted from the beginning in these formats at a print-quality resolution will speed the publication of the paper. After acceptance, authors will also be asked to provide an attractive image to highlight their paper online and in its accompanying synopsis.
Figure Legends
The aim of the figure legend should be to describe the key messages of the figure, but the figure should also be discussed in the text. An enlarged version of the figure and its full legend will often be viewed in a separate window online, and it should be possible for a reader to understand the figure without switching back and forth between this window and the relevant parts of the text. Each legend should have a concise title of no more than 15 words. The legend itself should be succinct, while still explaining all symbols and abbreviations. Avoid lengthy descriptions of methods.
Tables
All tables should have a concise title. Footnotes can be used to explain abbreviations. Citations should be indicated using the same style as outlined above. Tables occupying more than one printed page should be avoided, if possible. Very large tables can be published as online supplementary files.
Multimedia Files and Supporting Information
We encourage authors to submit multimedia files that are crucial to the conclusions of the paper. We also encourage authors to submit essential supporting files along with their manuscripts. All supporting material will be subject to peer review.
Video files should be submitted as uncompressed AVI or Quicktime files, and PLoS will compress the files to an appropriate size and quality. Other multimedia files (e.g., Shockwave Flash) should be smaller than 10 MB in size because of the difficulties that some users will experience in loading or downloading files of a greater size.
In the text, figures, tables, multimedia files, and datasets that make up the Supporting Information are referred to with a leading capital S (e.g., Figure S4 for the fourth supporting figure) and should be fall into one of the following categories: Figure, Table, Text, Dataset, Audio, or Video. Titles (and, if desired, legends) for all supporting information files should be listed in the manuscript under the heading "Supporting Information".
TOP
5. Submission of Research Manuscripts
Presubmission Inquiries
If you wish to submit an informal presubmission inquiry to sound out whether a manuscript is appropriate in principle, please e-mail your referenced abstract and a cover letter to biology_editors@plos.org. We will get back to you within a few days. Please do not send additional material. Entire manuscripts should be formally submitted.
Are You Ready to Submit Your Manuscript?
We have provided an author checklist to help you prepare your materials for submission and to make the online submission process as straightforward as possible. Please take the time to look through the list before submitting your article.
Cover Letter
It is important that you include a cover letter with your manuscript. Take the time to consider why this manuscript is suitable for publication in PLoS Biology. Why will your paper inspire the other members of your field, and how will it drive research forward? Please explain this in your cover letter.
Electronic Submission
Detailed instructions for submission can be found on the PLoS Biology Manuscript Submission and Peer Review website. Files are uploaded individually and are combined into a single PDF file, which must be approved by the author at the end of the submission process.
Hardcopies of your manuscript are not required.
Electronic formats
Text files can be submitted in the following formats: Word, WordPerfect, RTF, LaTeX, TeX, and PDF.
Graphics files can be submitted in the following formats: EPS, Excel, GIF, Illustrator, JPEG, PhotoShop, PowerPoint, or TIFF. If possible, please label all figures using Times Roman or some other serif font.
TOP
6. Other Types of Article
The front section of PLoS Biology is inclusive and accessible to a broad audience, while still scientifically rigorous. All articles submitted to the front section are directed at a readership that extends beyond the traditional research community and that includes scientific educators, students, physicians, patients, and the interested public. The front section provides opportunities for contributions not only from scientists, but also from authors who might not otherwise publish primary articles in PLoS Biology.
All articles in the front section of PLoS Biology are published by invitation only, but if you have a suggestion for a topic or an author in any of the following categories, we will be happy to consider the idea. Please contact the editors.
Essays
PLoS Biology publishes visionary and provocative essays that cover broad topics of general interest to life scientists.
Retrospectives
These cover key decisions, people, events, or research that has influenced the career of a leading scientist.
Journal club
Written by and limited to post-docs/graduate students, a journal club article should feature a paper (young or old) that has had a significant influence on your work. Why is this paper important to you? What is the context? What questions need to be investigated next? The journal club is written with the help and guidance of a group leader.
Book Reviews/Science in the Media
Written by scientists, advocates, science writers, or others, these are short reviews of books, films, plays, etc., that deal with some aspect of science or the scientific community.
Primers
Primers provide concise and accessible background information for a particular topic in biology that might be featured in one of the research articles in PLoS Biology or for an emerging technique or discipline that holds great promise for the life science research community.
Correspondence
Correspondence is considered for publication in PLoS Biology when it relates to issues of broad relevance to the life science community. We will also consider correspondence relating to a paper that PLoS Biology has published, but only when the correspondence is judged to affect the principal conclusions in the paper. Correspondence should be submitted using our Web site and should be limited to fewer than 600 words.
TOP
7. Outline of the Production Process
Once an article has been accepted for publication, the manuscript files are transferred into our production system. Manuscripts are then copyedited by professional copyeditors who correspond directly with the authors concerning queries and corrections. Once the article has been typeset, PDF proofs are generated so that authors can approve all editing and layout. The prompt return of proofs by authors will expedite the production process.
SEARCH PLoS Biology
Advanced Search
General Information:
Journal Information
Editorial Board
License
Contact Us
Help
Get Content Alerts
Order Print Issues
Privacy Statement
Info for Authors:
Editorial Policies
Author Guidelines
Figure Guidelines
Submission Checklist
Submit a Paper
Info for Reviewers
Reviewer Guidelines
Reviewer Login
Editorial Board
Julie Ahringer
University of Cambridge
United Kingdom
Shizuo Akira
Osaka University
Japan
Richard W Aldrich
Stanford University
United States of America
James Ashe
University of Minnesota
United States of America
Nick H. Barton
University of Edinburgh
United Kingdom
Konrad Basler
University of Zurich
Switzerland
Michael Bate
University of Cambridge
United Kingdom
Peter B. Becker
Adolf Butenandt Institute
Germany
Pamela J. Bjorkman
Howard Hughes Medical Institute/California Institute of Technology
United States of America
Peer Bork
EMBL Heidelberg
Germany
Anne-Lise Borresen-Dale
Norwegian Radium Hospital
Norway
Henry R. Bourne
UCSF Medical Center
United States of America
Lon Cardon
University of Oxford
United Kingdom
James C Carrington
Oregon State University
United States of America
Lars Chittka
University of London, Queen Mary College
United Kingdom
Joanne Chory
The Salk Institute for Biological Studies
United States of America
Steve Chu
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
United States of America
Jeffrey Dangl
University of North Carolina
United States of America
Titia De Lange
Rockefeller University
United States of America
Frans B. M. de Waal
Emory University
United States of America
Joseph L. DeRisi
University of California, San Francisco
United States of America
Barry Dickson
Austrian Academy of Sciences
Austria
Andy Dillin
The Salk Institute
United States of America
Andy P Dobson
Princeton University
United States of America
Sean Eddy
Washington University St. Louis
United States of America
Thomas Edlund
University of Ume?BR>Sweden
Thomas Egwang
Medical Biotechnology Labs
Uganda
Jonathan Andrew Eisen
University of California, Davis
United States of America
Steve Elledge
Harvard Medical School
United States of America
Steve P. Ellner
Cornell University
United States of America
Michael Emerman
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Res. Center
United States of America
Manfred Fahle
Bremen University
Germany
Susan M Gasser
Friedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research
Switzerland
Mikhail S Gelfand
Institute for Information Transmission Problems, RAS
Russian Federation
Richard A Gibbs
Baylor College of Medicine
United States of America
Margaret A Goodell
Baylor College of Medicine
United States of America
Douglas R Green
St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital
United States of America
Bryan T Grenfell
Penn State University
United States of America
James E Haber
Brandeis University
United States of America
Hiroshi Hamada
Osaka University
Japan
William A. Harris
Cambridge University
UK
Paul Harvey
University of Oxford
United Kingdom
Nicholas Hastie
MRC Human Genetics Unit
United Kingdom
R. Scott Hawley
Stowers Institute for Medical Research
United States of America
Joseph Heitman
Duke University
United States of America
Daniel Herschlag
Stanford University
United States of America
Winston Hide
University of the Western Cape
South Africa
David M Hillis
University of Texas
United States of America
Brigid L.M. Hogan
Duke University Medical Center
United States of America
Fred Hughson
Princeton University
United States of America
Tim Hunt
Imperial Cancer Research Fund
United Kingdom
Laurence D Hurst
University of Bath
United Kingdom
Jerry Joyce
Scripps Research Institute
United States of America
Jim Kadonaga
University of California, San Diego
United States of America
Laurent Keller
University of Lausanne
Switzerland
Christopher Kemp
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
United States of America
Chaitan Khosla
Stanford University
United States of America
Joel Kingsolver
The University of North Carolina
United States of America
Thomas B.L. Kirkwood
University of Newcastle upon Tyne
United Kingdom
Tom Kornberg
University of California, San Francisco
United States of America
Mark Krasnow
Stanford University School of Medicine
United States of America
Arthur D Lander
UC Irvine
United States of America
Andre Levchenko
Johns Hopkins
United States of America
Michael Lichten
National Cancer Institute
United States of America
Susan L. Lindquist
Whitehead Institute
United States of America
David J. Lipman
NCBI
United States of America
Edison T. Liu
Genome Institute of Singapore
Singapore
Michel Loreau
McGill University
Canada
Georgina M Mace
Institute of Zoology
United Kingdom
Philippa Marrack
National Jewish Medical and Research Center/Howard Hughes Medical Institute
United States of America
Alfonso Martinez Arias
Cambridge University
United Kingdom
Rowena G Matthews
University of Michigan
United States of America
Markus Meister
Harvard University
United States of America
Don J. Melnick
Columbia University
United States of America
Bénédicte Michel
Centre de Génétique Moléculaire
France
Emmanuel Mignot
Stanford University
United States of America
Tom Misteli
National Cancer Institute
United States of America
Nancy A. Moran
University of Arizona
United States of America
Craig Moritz
University of California, Berkeley
United States of America
Richard G. M. Morris
University of Edinburgh
United Kingdom
David Nemazee
Scripps Research Institute
United States of America
Eric Nestler
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
United States of America
Mohamed A.F. Noor
Duke University
United States of America
Roel Nusse
Stanford University
United States of America
Steve O'Rahilly
University of Cambridge
United Kingdom
Erin K O'Shea
Howard Hughes Medical Institute / Harvard University
United States of America
Svante Pääbo
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology
Germany
Nipam Patel
University of California, Berkeley
United States of America
David Penny
Massey University
New Zealand
Greg A Petsko
Brandeis University
United States of America
Lennart Philipson
Karolinska Institute
Sweden
Ronald H. A. Plasterk
Utrecht University
Netherlands
Hidde L Ploegh
Whitehead Institute
United States of America
Daphne Preuss
Howard Hughes Medical Institute
United States of America
Walt V. Reid
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment
Malaysia
Richard J Roberts
New England Biolabs
United States of America
Sarah Rowland-Jones
Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine
United Kingdom
Gerry M Rubin
University of California at Berkeley/Howard Hughes Medical Institute
United States of America
Mick D. Rugg
University of California, Irvine
United States of America
Ueli Schibler
University of Geneva
Switzerland
Manfred Schliwa
Adolf-Butenandt-Institut
Germany
David Samuel Schneider
Stanford University
United States of America
Matthew P Scott
Stanford University
United States of America
Idan Segev
Hebrew University
Israel
Daniel Simberloff
University of Tennessee
United States of America
Kai L Simons
Max-Planck-Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics
Germany
Mandyam V. Srinivasan
Australian National University
Australia
Derek Lyle Stemple
Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute
United Kingdom
Charles F. Stevens
Salk Institute for Biological Studies
United States of America
Bill Sugden
University of Wisconsin-Madison
United States of America
Sally Temple
Albany Medical College
United States of America
Janet Thornton
European Bioinformatics Institute
United Kingdom of Great Britain and N. Ireland
Chris Tyler-Smith
The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute
United Kingdom
Joan Valentine
University of California, Los Angeles
United States of America
Matt van de Rijn
Stanford University School of Medicine
United States of America
Herbert W. Virgin
Washington University School of Medicine
United States of America
Matt Waldor
Tufts University School of Medicine
United States of America
Peter Walter
University of California - San Francisco
United States of America
Gary E Ward
University of Vermont
United States of America
Detlef Weigel
Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology
Germany
Jonathan S. Weissman
University of California, San Francisco/Howard Hughes Medical Institute
United States of America
Marv Wickens
University of Wisconsin
United States of America
Ken H Wolfe
University of Dublin
Ireland
Phillip D. Zamore
University of Massachusetts Medical School
United States of America
Robert Zatorre
McGill University
Canada
Huda Y. Zoghbi
Baylor College of Medicine
United States of America
| 
刊名字顺( Alphabetical List of Journals):
返回页首 